The Food and Drug Administration is on the verge of making a significant decision regarding the ban of certain food dyes in the upcoming weeks. This decision comes after receiving a petition to review the safety of Red 3. NBC News has been closely following this matter.
The FDA's Stance on Food Dyes and Their Potential Impact
Background on Red 3
Red 3, which is derived from petroleum and can be found in various snacks, beverages, and candies, has been a subject of concern. Since its first approval in 1969, the FDA has reviewed its safety multiple times. However, a recent petition has urged for an additional review.This food dye gives a vibrant cherry red hue to many products, making them more appealing. But with the holiday season in full swing and sweet treats abundant, the presence of this chemical in our food becomes a matter of concern.Health Implications and Concerns
US Representative Frank Pallone Jr. (D-NJ) has expressed his worry, stating that there is "no reason" for this additive to be in food except to mislead customers. Thomas Galligan, a principal scientist at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, agrees, calling these food dyes a marketing tool rather than a necessary ingredient.While the FDA claims that food dyes are safe and do not pose health risks, there is evidence to the contrary. Some studies have shown potential harms such as ill effects on gut health and behavioral issues. For example, researchers have found that Red 3 causes cancer in animals.There are 27 human clinical trials that demonstrate these dyes can harm children's behavior. As some kids eat these foods, they experience nervous system effects similar to ADHD.International and State Bans
Red 3 is not only a topic of discussion in the US but is also banned in other countries and in the state of California. This raises questions about the consistency of regulations and the adequacy of the scientific research.Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health adjunct professor Jerold Mande emphasizes the importance of the precautionary principle. He believes that it is better to be safe than sorry, especially when there is "little science" conducted by the government on these dyes.Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who was tapped by President-elect Donald Trump to be health secretary, has previously claimed a link between food dyes and cancer. This adds to the ongoing debate and uncertainty surrounding the safety of these additives.